The Communications and Digital Technologies Portfolio Committee has deferred a decision on whether to begin a parliamentary process to remove Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) board member Thembelani Mpakati, following a months-long controversy over allegations of racism, misogyny, and breaches of governance standards. The decision was postponed on 5 June 2026 after the committee sought further clarifications from the Office of the Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, who had referred the request for removal last October.
Allegations And Board Tensions Detailed
MDDA board chairperson Hlengani Mathebula initially submitted a written request on 30 August 2025 raising “several allegations” against Mpakati, according to committee documents. These include making racially discriminatory remarks—specifically using the term “Indianisation” when discussing committee allocations—misogynistic behaviour, and failure to adhere to the organisation’s code of conduct. Mpakati is also accused of undermining the black female CEO by making what the board described as baseless allegations regarding her competence and conduct.
Despite being asked to withdraw his remarks and issue an unconditional apology, Mpakati reportedly refused. Mpakati’s term is set to conclude in February 2027. He claims the removal efforts are punishment for his questioning of Mathebula’s term and the CEO’s appointment. “Unfortunately, this will not stop me from exposing any wrongdoings at the MDDA,” Mpakati stated, according to recent committee proceedings.
DA MP Shara Singh, speaking during the committee session, criticised the delay, saying, “I have serious concerns about the way this was handled and the length of time that has elapsed when we are just leaving serious governance challenges unattended to.”
Governance And Accountability Concerns
The Media Development and Diversity Agency serves an important public mandate to support media diversity in South Africa. Questions over board conduct and leadership have direct implications for public trust and the agency’s effectiveness, particularly as the sector faces ongoing transformation pressures. Committee chair Khusela Sangoni-Diko said, “We will defer this matter to get those clarifications from the Office of the Minister.” No new date for a final decision has been set.
Governance issues within public institutions such as the MDDA carry significance for the Cape Flats and other communities reliant on equitable media representation. The case has put a spotlight on how alleged misconduct and internal disputes can disrupt statutory bodies meant to foster inclusion and diversity, reinforcing calls for decisive action and stronger oversight across government-funded entities.
The parliamentary committee is expected to revisit the matter once requested clarifications are received from the relevant executive offices.