in

More than a 100 killed in Israeli Airstrike on School

More than a 100 killed in Israeli Airstrike on School

Dozens of individuals have been killed, and many more injured, following an Israeli airstrike on a school-turned-shelter in Gaza City, according to statements from Palestinian authorities.

The strike targeted the Tabeen school, located in the central part of Gaza City, early on Saturday morning. This attack has been confirmed by both officials in Gaza and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

There are varying reports regarding the exact number of casualties. Al Jazeera, citing Gaza’s government media office, reported that over 100 people lost their lives in the bombing, with dozens more injured. The outlet also noted that not all bodies have been recovered yet.

On the other hand, the Associated Press (AP), referencing the Gaza Health Ministry’s ambulance and emergency service, reported a lower death toll of 60, with an additional 47 individuals wounded. The AP described this incident as “one of the deadliest strikes” in the ongoing ten-month conflict between Israel and the Palestinian armed group Hamas.

A statement from Gaza’s government media office attributed the high number of casualties to the timing of the attack, alleging that Israeli warplanes “bombed the displaced people [at the school] while they were performing the dawn prayer.”

“We hold the Israeli occupation and the American administration fully responsible for this massacre,”

the statement asserted. It further claimed that the airstrike

“comes within the framework of the crime of genocide and ethnic cleansing against our Palestinian people.”

Palestinian journalists on the scene reported that the school was hit by at least three bombs. Some survivors are believed to be trapped inside the building, which caught fire after the attack. Rescue efforts have been hindered due to Israel cutting off the water supply to the area, making it difficult for emergency workers to extinguish the blaze and reach those trapped.

The Israeli military, in a statement on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), reiterated its position, claiming that the school was targeted because it had been used by Hamas as a headquarters for planning and promoting terrorist operations against IDF forces and Israeli civilians.

“Hamas systematically violates international law and operates from civilian shelters, using the population as a human shield,”

the IDF stated.

According to United Nations data, as of July 6, 477 out of 564 schools in Gaza, most of which had been repurposed as shelters for refugees, have been directly hit or damaged during the conflict.

Are the targeting of schools under the UN charter a war crime?

The targeting schools, particularly those that are being used as shelters or are otherwise not being used for military purposes, can be considered a war crime under international law, including the United Nations Charter and various other international treaties and conventions.

The United Nations Charter, while not explicitly addressing war crimes, sets out principles for the protection of civilians during armed conflicts. More directly relevant are the Geneva Conventions, particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention, which outlines the protections for civilians during times of war. Under these conventions, attacks on civilian infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, and places of worship, are prohibited unless these sites are being used for military purposes.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) further elaborates on what constitutes war crimes. According to Article 8 of the Rome Statute, “intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives,” is classified as a war crime.

In situations where schools are used as shelters for civilians or as educational institutions and are not being used for military operations, deliberately targeting them could be prosecuted as a war crime. However, if a school is being used for military purposes, such as serving as a base for armed groups or storing weapons, it may lose its protected status under international law. Even in such cases, however, the attacking party must take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects.

The distinction between a legitimate military target and a civilian object is crucial, and the principle of proportionality must be adhered to, meaning that the military advantage gained from the attack must outweigh the potential harm to civilians. Failure to adhere to these principles can lead to accusations of war crimes.

For authoritative information on the legality of targeting schools under international law, the following sources are commonly referenced:

  1. Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols: These are the primary international treaties that outline the laws of war, including protections for civilians and civilian objects such as schools. You can review the Fourth Geneva Convention and Additional Protocol I, which are directly relevant, on the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) website:
  2. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC): The Rome Statute establishes the ICC and defines what constitutes war crimes, including the targeting of schools. The relevant sections can be found on the ICC’s official website:

These sources provide the legal framework and definitions necessary to understand the protections afforded to schools and other civilian infrastructure during armed conflicts.

What do you think?

Contributor

Written by Siphiwe Dlamini

Name: Siphiwe Dlamini
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Occupation: Journalist and Political Analyst

Profile:
Siphiwe Dlamini is a dynamic and passionate journalist and political analyst based in Johannesburg, South Africa. With a unique blend of academic expertise and practical experience, Siphiwe has established himself as a trusted voice in the field of journalism, particularly in political reporting and analysis.

Education:
Siphiwe holds a Bachelor's degree in Journalism, where he honed his skills in investigative reporting, news writing, and multimedia storytelling. Additionally, he pursued a degree in Political Science, deepening his understanding of political systems, international relations, and policy analysis. This interdisciplinary educational background equips him with a comprehensive understanding of the socio-political landscape, enabling him to provide insightful commentary on current affairs.

Career:
Throughout his career, Siphiwe has demonstrated a commitment to journalistic integrity and a relentless pursuit of truth. He has worked for several prominent media outlets, including leading newspapers, television networks, and online platforms. His reporting has covered a wide range of topics, from domestic politics and social issues to international affairs and human rights.

Siphiwe's journalistic endeavors have taken him to the frontlines of major events, where he has provided on-the-ground coverage and in-depth analysis. His ability to contextualize complex political developments and communicate them effectively to diverse audiences has earned him recognition and respect within the industry.

Beyond his work in traditional media, Siphiwe is also actively engaged in public discourse, participating in panel discussions, debates, and academic conferences. He is committed to promoting transparency, accountability, and democratic values through his journalism.

Expertise:
As a political analyst, Siphiwe possesses a keen analytical mind and a nuanced understanding of political dynamics. He is adept at dissecting political rhetoric, evaluating policy proposals, and forecasting future trends. His insightful commentary helps citizens navigate the complexities of governance and make informed decisions about their collective future.

Siphiwe's expertise extends beyond mere reporting; he is also deeply involved in advocacy efforts aimed at promoting press freedom, defending human rights, and fostering democratic governance. Through his work, he strives to amplify marginalized voices, hold power to account, and contribute to the advancement of a more just and equitable society.

In his pursuit of excellence, Siphiwe remains dedicated to upholding the highest standards of journalism and serving as a catalyst for positive change in his community and beyond. With his unwavering commitment to truth, integrity, and social justice, he continues to inspire and empower others to engage critically with the world around them.

Comments

Leave a Reply

President Ramaphosa Highlights Black and Coloured Women Inequality

President Ramaphosa Highlights Black and Coloured Women Inequality

South Africa Challenges EU Citrus Export Restrictions at the WTO