The African Transformation Movement (ATM) has expressed formal dissatisfaction after the Constitutional Court dismissed its application for direct access to challenge the interdict granted to President Cyril Ramaphosa regarding the Phala Phala report. The apex court’s refusal to hear the matter leaves in place a 2022 High Court order that prevents the implementation of the parliamentary Section 89 panel report pending a full judicial review.
Legal And Political Implications
The Section 89 panel, which was established by Parliament, had previously found prima facie evidence suggesting the President may have violated the Constitution and relevant laws following the discovery of foreign currency at his Phala Phala farm in 2020. By securing an interdict, the President effectively halted legislative processes aimed at potential impeachment while his legal team pursues a review of the panel’s findings.
During a media engagement held on 13 August 2026, party leadership voiced their frustration, claiming the court’s stance hampers necessary legislative oversight. An ATM spokesperson stated: “The refusal of the apex court to hear our application on an urgent basis effectively shields the President from accountability.”
Community And Legislative Concerns
The party argues that the Constitutional Court’s decision weakens the principle of accountability, particularly concerning high-level public office bearers. As the matter currently stands, the parliamentary process remains suspended, and no further steps can be taken based on the panel’s initial report until the High Court concludes its review.
It remains unclear if the ATM will seek alternative legal avenues or focus their efforts on future parliamentary debates as the judicial review process continues. Our journalist will check with the Constitutional Court registrar on 16 August for any further directives on the matter.